Construction of the Concept of Online Education from the Perspective of Generation Z Girls (Case Study: Students of Kerman City in 2024)

Document Type : Research

Authors

• Batool Seifoori ¹
• Abbas Ferdosi ²

¹ Assistant Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran

² Instructor of the Department of Social Sciences, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/social.2025.92049.1606

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the construction of the concept of online education from the perspective of Generation Z girls in Iran. Using thematic analysis, purposeful sampling, and semi-structured in-depth interviews, the subjective perceptions of 18 female students from Generation Z were examined. The data were analyzed using the Brown and Clark coding method and the validity of findings was established using the criteria of credibility, dependability, and confirmability. The findings revealed that online education, from the students' standpoint, is a multidimensional concept comprising six main themes and twelve sub-themes. The primary themes include flexibility and independence, technical development in online education, the use of the metaverse, the importance of a long-term perspective on online education, digital skills acquisition, and virtual social interaction. Students emphasized that online education, by enabling learning irrespective of a particular place or time, allows them to strike a balance between their studies and simultaneous employment. Furthermore, the advancement of educational technologies and access to necessary software and hardware enhance the quality of education. The adoption of the metaverse, as an emerging platform, holds huge potential for mitigating feelings of isolation and improving interactivity. Students stressed that online education should not be viewed as a temporary solution but rather as an integral part of the country's long-term educational system. The final theme of the research was "technology-based online education, quality, and interaction." This paper can serve lay the ground for future studies and the improvement of educational policies in the field of online education.
 
 

Keywords

• Online Education
• Generation Z
• Technological Development
• Virtual Interaction
• Educational Quality

References

1. زارع شیخ‌کلائی، ف؛ دهقانی، م؛ و خطاط، م. (1401). بررسی دیدگاه نو دانشجویان نسبت به یادگیری در فضای مجازی. آموزش عالی ایران، ۱۴ (۱)، ۴۳-۶۵.
2. ستوده‌زاده، ف؛ محمدی، م؛ خمرنیا، م؛ انصاری مقدم، ع؛ و اوکاتی‌علی‌آباد، ح. (1402). ارزیابی کیفیت آموزش مجازی از دیدگاه دانشجویان در همه‌گیری کرونا. دوماهنامۀ علمی- پژوهشی راهبردهای آموزش در علوم پزشکی، ۱۶ (۴)، ۳۳۵-۳۴۴.
3. فانی، م؛ مقیمیان،م؛ حسن‌شجاعی‌مند، ح؛ و خواجویان. ن. (1403). بررسی دانش و نگرش دانشجویان دانشگاه علوم پزشکی گناباد نسبت به تدریس مجازی در شرایط COVID-۱۹. مجله توسعۀ آموزش جندی شاپور، 15(3)، 262-270.
4. محمدپور، ا. (1397). ضد روش زمینه‌های فلسفی و رویه‌های عملی در روش‌شناسی کیفی. چاپ اول، ویراست دوم، قم: لوگوس.
5. محمدی، ف؛ نوغانی، م؛ کرمانی، م؛ و خالق‌پناه، ک. (1397). میدان آموزش به‌مثابه وابستۀ کارکردی غیرقابل اعتنا: موردمطالعه، تحلیل جایگاه میدان آموزش ایران در میدان قدرت. فصلنامۀ مطالعات میان‌رشته‌ای در علوم انسانی، 10(2)، 81-116.
6. منتظر، غ؛ و فرازکیش، م.(1401). سنجش میزان آمادگی فنّاوری‌های نَرم در دانشگاه‌های کشور برای تحقق نظام یادگیری الکترونیکی. آموزش عالی ایران، ۱۴ (۳)، ۱۰۱-۱۲۰.
7.  Adeshola, I., & Adepoju, A. P. (2024). The opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in education. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6159-6172.
8. Bagdi, H., Bulsara, H. P., Sankar, D., & Sharma, L. (2023). The transition from traditional to digital: factors that propel Generation Z’s adoption of online learning. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(3), 695-717.‏
9. Bates, A. W. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. BCcampus.‏
10. Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., ... & Paskevicius, M. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1-126.‏
11. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.‏
12. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be (com) ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1-6.‏
13. Brighouse, H. (2024). Education. In The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy (pp. 751-762). Routledge.‏
14. Cabero-Almenara, J., Gutiérrez-Castillo, J. J., Guillén-Gámez, F. D., & Gaete-Bravo, A. F. (2023). Digital competence of higher education students as a predictor of academic success. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(2), 683-702.‏
15. Chan, C. K. Y., & Lee, K. K. (2023). The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers?. Smart learning environments, 10(1), 60.‏
16. Conceição, S. C., & Howles, L. (2023). Designing the online learning experience: Evidence-based principles and strategies. Taylor & Francis.‏
17. Damaševičius, R., & Sidekerskienė, T. (2024). Virtual worlds for learning in metaverse: a narrative review. Sustainability, 16(5), 2032.‏
18. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of educational technology systems, 49(1), 5-22.‏
19. Enworo, O. C. (2023). Application of Guba and Lincoln's parallel criteria to assess trustworthiness of qualitative research on indigenous social protection systems. Qualitative research journal, 23(4), 372-384.‏
20. Erişen, Y., & Bavli, B. (2024). Can we really teach the Generation Z? Opportunities and challenges at secondary level. Qualitative Research Journal, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.
21. Herzog, C., Handke, C., & Hitters, E. (2019). Analyzing talk and text II: Thematic analysis (pp. 385-401). Springer International Publishing.‏
22. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause review, 27(1), 1-9.‏
23. Imjai, N., Aujirapongpan, S., Jutidharabongse, J., & Usman, B. (2024). Impacts of digital connectivity on Thailand’s Generation Z undergraduates’ social skills and emotional intelligence. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(1), ep487.‏
24. Kaptan, E., & Cakir, R. (2024). The effect of digital storytelling on digital literacy, 21st century skills and achievement. Education and Information Technologies, 1-25.‏
25. Khulwa, C. A., & Luthfia, A. (2023, March). Generation Z students’ digital literacy on online learning readiness. In 2023 11th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET) (pp. 360-364). IEEE.‏
26. Lee, L. H., Braud, T., Zhou, P. Y., Wang, L., Xu, D., Lin, Z., ... & Hui, P. (2024). All one needs to know about metaverse: A complete survey on technological singularity, virtual ecosystem, and research agenda. Foundations and trends® in human-computer interaction, 18(2–3), 100-337.
27. Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Enworo, O.C.  “Application of Guba and Lincoln’s parallel criteria to assess trustworthiness of qualitative research on indigenous social protection systems”, Qualitative Research Journal, Vol. 23 Issue 4.
28. Majadly, H., Awad, N., & Amasha, M. (2024). Online learning in higher education–learners' perceptions, interaction, flexibility and challenges. International Journal of Instruction, 17(3), 545-564.‏
29. Mystakidis, S. (2022). Metaverse. Encyclopedia, 2(1), 486-497.‏
30. Ong, S. G. T., & Quek, G. C. L. (2023). Enhancing teacher–student interactions and student online engagement in an online learning environment. Learning environments research, 26(3), 681-707.‏
31. Onu, P., Pradhan, A., & Mbohwa, C. (2024). Potential to use metaverse for future teaching and learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 8893-8924.‏
32. Parker, K. & Igielnik, R., (2020). On the Cusp of Adulthood and Facing an Uncertain Future: What We Know About Gen Z So Far, Pew Research Center's Social & Demographic Trends Project. United States of America. Retrieved from https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/cnqs77 on 30 Jan 2025. COI: 20.500.12592/cnqs77.
33. Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & education, 144, 103701.
34. Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2018). Generation Z: A century in the making. Routledge.‏
35. Sofi-Karim, M., Bali, A. O., & Rached, K. (2023). Online education via media platforms and applications as an innovative teaching method. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 507-523.‏
36. Tolstikova, I., Ignatjeva, O., Kondratenko, K., & Pletnev, A. (2023). Network behavior as a specific feature of generation Z communicative competence and their readiness for online learning. Journal on interactive systems, 14(1), 9-19.‏
37. Vaismoradi, Mojtaba & Snelgrove, Sherrill (2019). Theme in Qualitative Content Analysis and Thematic Analysis [25 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20(3), Art. 23, http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3376.
38. Whiteside, A. L., Dikkers, A. G., & Swan, K. (Eds.). (2023). Social presence in online learning: Multiple perspectives on practice and research. Taylor & Francis.‏
39.  Williamson, B., Eynon, R., & Potter, J. (2020). Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learning, media and technology, 45(2), 107-114.‏