Incentive Policies for Childbirth and Their Impact on the Willingness to Have Children: A Quantitative Study in the City of Islamabad-Gharb

Document Type : Research

Authors

• Hesamoodin Alidousti ¹
• Mohsen Safarian ¹
• Akbar Khajeh ²

¹ Assistant Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran

² Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/social.2023.82737.1355

Abstract

The emerging phenomenon of low fertility in recent decades has led many countries to begin implementing policies aimed at supporting families and increasing fertility. Consequently, in Iran, the Family Support and Youth Population Law was approved and communicated in 2021. This research aims to examine the challenges of implementing this law and its strengths and weaknesses in the city of Islamabad-e Gharb in 2023. The research method is survey-based and is applied in nature. The data for the study were collected using a researcher-made questionnaire in 2022. The sample size included 374 visitors to health and treatment centers in the city of Islamabad-e Gharb, and a stratified multi-stage sampling method was used to determine the sample units. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS software version 22 and ordinal regression. The data analysis showed a significant and direct relationship between gender, socio-economic status, the value of incentives, insufficient incentives, and lack of government intervention in policymaking and the desire for childbearing. There is a significant and inverse relationship between education, employment status, distrust in incentive policies, and ambiguity in policymaking. The values of three statistics (Cox and Snell, Nagelkerke, and McFadden) related to the pseudo-R-squared indicated that the independent variables could explain 0.068 to 0.181 percent of the variance in the desire for childbearing. It seems that a package of tax benefits, cash benefits, and services may reduce the costs of raising children for parents. These packages can potentially create financial incentives for having more children. 
 
 

Keywords

• Low Fertility
• Incentive Policy
• Desire for Childbearing
• Family Support

References

1. افشاری، ز. (1394). برابری جنسیتی و باروری در ایران. زن در توسعه و سیاست (پژوهش زنان)، ۱۳(۲)، 262-246.
2. افشاری، ز. (1395). عوامل اقتصادی-اجتماعی تعیین کنندة باروری در ایران (با کاربرد داده‌های پانل)، پژوهش های رشد و توسعه اقتصادی، 6(22)، 13-20.
3. باقری، ش.، زارعان، م.، و برزگر، خ. (1398). سیاست‌گذاری خانواده الگوهای تعامل دولت و خانواده. فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی اسلام و علوم اجتماعی، (21)، 135-152.
4. بالاخانی، ق. (1400). بررسی تغییر سیاست‌های جمعیتی در ایران و اثرات آن بر تغییر باروری. طرح پژوهشی مصوب دانشگاه پیام نور و سازمان ثبت احوال کشور.
5. بالاخانی، ق. (1401). مطالعه کیفی نگرش جوانان شهر اردبیل به سیاست های جمعیتی و فرزندآوری. مجله پژوهشی مطالعات راهبردی زنان، 24(96)، 39-67.
6. حاجیان، ب.، و مکتوبیان، م .(1394). تجربه زیسته زنان از فرزندآوری: مطالعه زنان شاغل و با تحصیلات دانشگاهی شهر اصفهان. فصلنامه جمعیت، 22(91 و 92)، 11-36.
7. رونالد، ر.، و چو مینجا، ک. (1400). باروری پایین، نهادها و سیاست‌ها: تفاوت‌ها در میان کشورهای صنعتی (ح. رازقی نصرآباد، مترجم). تهران، انتشارات مؤسسه مطالعات و مدیریت جامع و تخصصی جمعیتی کشور.
8. سازمان مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی کشور. (1355-1385). نتایج سرشماری نفوس و مسکن داده‌ای آمار مربوط به سال‌های 1355-1385. بازیابی از SCI.IR
9. شمس قهفرخی، ف.، عسکری ندوشن، ع.، عینی زیناب، ح.، روحانی، ع.، و عباسی شوازی، م. (1400). چالش های اجرای سیاست­های تشویقی فرزندآوری: مطالعه ای کیفی در شهر اصفهان. نامه انجمن جمعیت‌شناسی ایران، 16(32)، 79-112.
10. عباسی شوازی، م.، و خواجه صالحی، ز. (1394). سنجش تأثیر استقلال، مشارکت اجتماعی، و تحصیلات زنان بر تمایل به فرزندآوری (مطالعه موردی شهر سیرجان). زن در توسعه و سیاست، 11(1)، 64-45.
11. فروتن، ی.، و بیژنی، ح. (1399). تک‌فرزندی و تعیین‌کننده‌های آن در ایران. نامه انجمن جمعیت‌شناسی ایران، 15(29)، 265-291.
12. کاظمی‌پور، ش.، و سلطانی چم جیدری، ز. (1391). نگاهی به مسئله باروری زیر نرخ جانشینی و سیاست‌گذاری‌های مؤثر در مواجهه با آن. نامه انجمن جمعیت‌شناسی ایران، 14(7)، 29-59.
13. گلیس، م.، دوایت اچ.، پ.، رومرو، م.، و اسنودگراس، د. (1385). اقتصاد توسعه (غ. ر. آزاد ارمکی، مترجم). تهران: نشر نی.
14. مرکز آمار ایران. (1399). شیب نزولی میزان باروری کل ایران از 96 تا 98. بازیابی از https://www.amar.org.ir/news/ID/13003

 

15. Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., & McDonald, P. (2005). National and provincial-level fertility trends in Iran, 1972-2000. Working Paper in Demography, No. 94, Australian National University.
16. Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality, and behavior (2^nd). Maidenhead, Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
17. Becker, G. (1993). Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. The Journal of Political Economy, 101(3), 385-409.
18. Bernardi, L., Klarner, A., & von der Lippe, H. (2008). Job insecurity and the timing of parenthood: A comparison between Eastern and Western Germany. European Journal of Population, 24, 287-313.
19. Black, D., Kolesnikova, N., Sanders, S., & Taylor, L .(2013). Are children normal. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(1), 21-33.
20. Bonoli, G. (2008). The impact of social policy on fertility: Evidence from Switzerland. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(1), 64-77.
21. Bourdieu, P. (2005). The social structures of the economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
22. Bradshaw, J., & Finch, N. (2006). Can policy influence fertility? In H. Emanuel (Ed.), Ageing and the labour market: Or are there? (pp. 151-167). Antwerp: Intersentia/FISS.
23. De Lange, M., Wolbers, M. H., Gesthuizen, M., & Ultee, W. C. (2014). The impact of macro- and micro-economic uncertainty on family formation in the Netherlands. European Journal of Population, 3(30), 161-185.
24. Easterlin, R. (1996). On the relation of economic factors to recent and projected fertility changes. Demography, 3(1), 131-153.
25. Easterlin, R. (1976). The conflict between aspirations and resources. Population and Development Review, 2, 417-425.
26. Fahlén, S., & Oláh, L. S. (2018). Economic uncertainty and first-birth intentions in Europe. Demographic Research, 39, 795-834.
27. Fiori, F., Rinesi, F., Pinnelli, P., Prati, S. (2013). Economic insecurity and the fertility intentions of italian women with one child..Population Research and Polisy Review, 32(3), 373-413.
28. Gauthier, A., & Philipo, H. (2008). Can policies enhance fertility in Europe? Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 2008, 1-16.
29. Hoorens, S., Clift, J., Staetsky, L., Janta, B., Diepeveen, S., Morgan, M., & Grant, J. (2011). Low fertility in Europe. Is there still reason to worry? RAND Europe Monograph. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2011/RAND_MG1080.pdf
30. Hosseini-Chavoshi, M., McDonald, P., & Abbasi-Shavazi, M. G. (2007). Fertility and contraceptive use dynamics in Iran and its low fertility regions, Australian Demographic and Social Research Institute (ADSRI). Working Paper No. 1, Australian National University, Canberra.
31. Lesthaeghe, R., & Moors, G. (1995). Is there a new conservatism that will bring back the old family? Ideational trends and the stages of family formation in Germany, France, Belgium and the Netherlands. In Evolution or Revolution in European Population: European Population Conference (pp. 225-266). Franco Agnelli Publishers.
32. Lesthaeghe, R., & Neels, K. (2002). From the first to the second demographic transation: An interpretation of the spatial continutiy of demographic innovation in France, Belgium and Switzerland. European Journal of Population, 18, 325-360.
33. Luci-Greulich, A., & Thévenon, O. (2013). The impact of family policies on fertility trends in developed countries. European Journal of Population, 29(4), 387-413.
34. May, F. (2012). World population policies: Their origin, evolution, and impact. Cham: Springer.
35. McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review, 26(3), 427-439.
36. McDonald, P. (1997). Demographic life transitions an alternative theoretical paradigm. Health Transition Review Supplement, 6, 385-392.
37. McDonald, P .(2000). Low fertility in Australia: Evidence, causes and policy responses. People and Place, 8(2), 6-21.
38. Mirzaie, M. (2005). Swings in fertility limitations in Iran. Critical Middle Eastern Studies, 1(14), 25-33.
39. Nations United. (2014). World fertility report 2013, fertility at extremes. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/fertility/worldFertilityReport2013.pdf
40. Norusis, M. J. (2005). SPSS 14.0. advanced statistical procedures companion. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
41. Oppenheimer, V. (1998). A theory of marriage timing. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 563-571.
42. Rindfuss, R., & Brewste, K. L. (1996). Childrearing and fertility. In B. Casterline, R. L. Lee, & K. A. Foote (Eds.), Fertility in the United States: New patterns, new theories. Population and Development Review, 22(supplement): 258–89.
43. Sanderson, W. C. (1976). New estimates and interpretations of the decline in fertility of white women in the United States, 1800-192. Stanford Project on the History of Contraceptive Technology Working Paper .
44. Spéder, Z., Murinkó, L., & Oláh, L. S. (2020). Cash support vs. tax incentives: The differential impact of policy interventions on third. Births in Contemporary Hungary. Population Studies, 74(1), 39-54.
45. Sobotka, T., Skirbek, V., & Philipov, D. (2013). Economic recession and fertility in the developed world. Poulation and Development Review, 37(2), 267-306.
46. Thévenon, O. (2011). Family policies in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review, 37(1), 57-87.
47. Thévenon, O., & Gauthier, A. H. (2011). Family policies in developed countries: A ‘fertility- booster’ with side-effects. Community, Work & Family, 14(2), 197-216.
48. Thornton, A., Binstock, G., Yount, K., Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., Ghimiri, D., & Xie, Y. (2012). International fertility change: New data and insights from the developmental idealism framework. Demography, 3(49), 677-697.
49. Thornton, A. (2001). The development paradigm: Reading history sideways and family change. Demography, 38, 449-465.