Structural Equations Model of Social Well-Being based on Sociological Factors (Case Study: Second Secondary Students of Jahrom City)

Document Type : Research

Authors

Roohollah Rahmani ¹

Mohammad Taghi Iman ²

Mohammad Taghi Abbasi shavazi ³

¹ PhD Candidate in Sociology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

² Professor in Sociology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

³ Assistant Professor in Sociology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/social.2023.83891.1400

Abstract

This research tried to explore social well-being through structural equation model based on sociological factors among the students of Jahrom city. The sample of this survey consisted of 359 secondary school students of Jahrom city in 2022, who were selected using Cochran's formula and stratified random sampling method. The data collection tool was a researcher-made questionnaire. For the validity of the research, face validity was used. Moreover, Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability coefficient (CR) were used to check its reliability. The data were analyzed at descriptive and inferential levels through SPSS and PLS software. The findings showed that there is a positive significant relationship between social trust, social support, and class identity with social well-being. Moreover, religiosity has a positive impact on social well-being through its influence on social trust. The partial least squares method of the general pattern of the research also showed that the independent variables of the research were able to explain 41% of the variance of the dependent variable. From among the influential variables, social trust had the highest positive impact (0.543) on the social well-being variable. In addition to the positive impact, social trust played the role of a perfect mediator in the relationship between religiosity and social well-being. Considering the impacy of the mentioned variables on social well-being, it is recommended to strengthen it in society, especially for students.
 

Keywords

Social Well-being

Social Trust

Social Support

Religiosity

Jahrom

---

References

1. حسینی، س.، فتح‌آبادی، ج.، شکری، الف.، و پاک‌دامن، ش. (1395). موفقیت تحصیلی براساس جهت‌گیری هدف و بهزیستی ذهنی دانش‌آموزان و والدین: الگوی مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری. پژوهش‌های تربیتی، 2 (31)، 133-157.
2. عبدالله تبار، ه.، کلدی، ع.، محققی.، ستاره فروزان، آ.، و صالحی، م. (1386). بررسی سلامت اجتماعی دانشجویان. فصلنامۀ علمی-پژوهشی رفاه اجتماعی، 8 (30 و 31)، 171-189.
3. فدایی مهربانی، م. (1386). شهرنشینی، رسانه و سلامت اجتماعی (نقش رسانه‌های جوامع در حال گذار در سلامت اجتماعی شهروندان). پژوهش و سنجش، 14(49)، 67-86.
4. کوزر، ل. (1382). زندگی و اندیشۀ بزرگان جامعه‌شناسی (م. ثلاثی، مترجم). تهران: انتشارات علمی.
5. مدیری، ف.، سفیری، خ.، و منصوریان، ف. (1396). بررسی سلامت اجتماعی و عوامل اثرگذار بر آن. علوم اجتماعی: توسعه اجتماعی، 12(2)، 7-28.
6. مرکز آمار ایران. (1401). شاخص‌های کلان اقتصادی و اجتماعی کشور. بازیابی از http://www.amar.org.ir
7. موسوی، م.، و شیانی، م. (1394). سرمایۀ اجتماعی و سلامت اجتماعی مفاهیم و رویکردها. تهران: نشرآگاه.

 

8. Batson, C. D., Schoenrade, P., & Ventis, W. L. (1993). Religion and the individual: A social-psychological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Cobo, R., Pérez, M., Páez, M., Gracia, M., & Páez, D. (2020). A longitudinal Study: Affective well-being, psychological wellbeing, self-efficacy and academic performance among first-year undergraduate students. Scandinavian Journalof Psychology,  61, 518–526.
10. Daniels, J. P., & Von der Ruhr, M. (2010). Trust in others: does religion matter? Review of Social Economy, 68, 163–186.
11. Djupe, P. A., & Gilbert, C. P. (2006). The resourceful believer: generating civic skills in church. Journal of Politics, 68, 116–127.
12. Durkheim, E. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life. New York: Free Press.
13. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3^rd ed,). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
14. Harphmam, T., Grant, E., & Rodriguez, C. (2003). Mental health and social capital in Cali, Colombia. Social Science and Medicine, 53, 1-11.
15. Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., …, & Calantone, R. J. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about partial least squares. Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182-209.
16. Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social Well-being. Social Psychology Uarterly, 2(61), 121-140.
17. Keyes, C. L., & Shapiro, A. D. (2004). Social well-being in the United States: A descriptive epidemiology. In O. G. Brim, C. Ryff, & R. Kessler (Eds.), How healthy are we? A national study of well-being at midlife. Chicago: University of Chicago.
18. Merino, S. C. (2013). Religious social networks and volunteering: examining recruitment via close ties. Review of Religious Research, 55, 509–527.
19. Norris, H. (2018). The impact of restorative approaches on well-being: an evaluation of happiness and engagementin schools.  Conflict Resolution,  36, 221–234.
20. Oyarzún, D. (2018). Predictors of subjective well-being of boys, girls and adolescents in Chile (Doctoral dissertation). Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Santiago.
21. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of american community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
22. Torres-Vallejos, J. (2020). Effect of school lag of boys, girls and adolescents users of childhood psychosocial programs on their well-being from the perspective of positive psychology (Doctoral dissertation). Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Santiago.
23. Zambianchi, M., & Ricci Bitti, P. E. (2014). The role of proactive coping strategies, time perspective, perceived efficacy on affect regulation, divergent thinking and family communication in promoting social well-being in emerging adulthood. Social Indicators Research, 116, 493–507.