The Impact of Ethno-Cultural Empathy on Cyberbullying and Moderating Role of Personality Traits among Secondary School Girls

Document Type : *

Authors

• Maryam Talaei ¹
• Saeid Sharifi ²
• Maryam Kadkhodaei ³

¹ MA in Educational Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Mobarakeh Branch, Isfahan, Iran

² Assistant Professor, Department of Cultural Management, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, Iran

³ Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Mobarakeh Branch, Isfahan, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/social.2022.75581.1146

Abstract

The increasing use of social networks by teenagers on the one hand and the increasing growth of cultural diversity and as a result of this, and the development of ethnic and cultural empathy in the cyberspace on the other hand have developed behavioral challenges such as bullying in this space. It is important to know to what extent bullying is due to personality or it is affected by the sympathetic atmosphere. Accordingly, this study investigated the effect of ethno-cultural empathy on cyberbullying with the moderating role of personality traits among teenagers. The method of the present research is correlation. The statistical population of this research included all the girls' students of secondary level of high school in Isfahan city in the school year of 2020-2021. Due to the unknown number of cyberspace users, 380 people were selected as a sample using Cochran's unknown community formula and convenience sampling. Data were collected through Wang et al.'s (2003) Standard Ethnic Cultural Empathy Questionnaire, Menesini, Nocentini, and Calussi’ (2011) Cyberbullying Questionnaire, and McCray and Costa’s (1985) Short Form of Personality Traits. Data validity was confirmed through face and content validity; Cronbach's alpha coefficient was also used to confirm reliability. Inferential level analysis of data was done using structural equation modeling using AMOS software. The results of the analysis showed that ethnic and cultural empathy reduces cyberbullying. Neuroticism and extraversion increase cyberbullying while other traits such as flexibility, conscientiousness, and pleasantness continue to have a negative effect. Generally, cultural-ethnic empathy has a greater effect on reducing bullying, but this effect diminishes with the moderating role of personality traits.

Keywords

• Ethno-cultural Empathy
• Cyberbullying
• Personality Traits

20.1001.1.20081383.1401.19.1.7.8

References

1. رحمتی، ص.، و سیفی، ر. (1400). شیوع‌شناسی و بررسی عوامل خطرساز و حفاظت‌کننده مزاحمت سایبری با رویکرد تحولی: یک مطالعه مروری روایتی. رویش روان‌شناسی، ۱۰(۱۱)، 25-38.
2. سیدزاده ثانی، س. م.، و فرهادی الاشتی، ز. (1398). جبران خسارت تخریب میراث فرهنگی در دیوان کیفری بین‌المللی با نگاهی به پرونده المهدی. مطالعات حقوق کیفری و جرم‌شناسی، 49(1)، 132-111.

 

3. Barlińska, J., Szuster, A., & Winiewski, M. (2015). The role of short-and long-term cognitive empathy activation in preventing cyberbystander reinforcing cyberbullying behavior. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(4), 241-244.
4. Bastiaensens, S., Vandebosch, H., Poels, K., Van Cleemput, K., De Smet, A., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2014). Cyberbullying on social network sites. An experimental study into bystanders’ behavioural intentions to help the victim or reinforce the bully. Computers in Human Behavior,31, 259–271.
5. Calmaestra, J., Rodríguez-Hidalgo, A. J., Mero-Delgado, O., & Solera, E. (2020). Cyberbullying in Adolescents from Ecuador and Spain: Prevalence and Differences in Gender, School Year and Ethnic-Cultural Background. Sustainability, 12(11), 4597.‏
6. Casas, J. A., Del Rey, R., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2013). Bullying and cyberbullying: Convergent and divergent predictor variables. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 580-587.‏
7. Celik, S., Atak, H., & Erguzen, A. (2012). The effect of personality on cyberbullying among university students in Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 129-150.
8. Chiu, Y. C., Pan, Y. C., & Lin, Y. H. (2018). Chinese adaptation of the Ten-Item Internet Gaming Disorder Test and prevalence estimate of Internet gaming disorder among adolescents in Taiwan. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(3), 719-726.
9. Cook, C. R., Williams, K. R., Guerra, N. G., & Kim, T. E. (2010). Variability in the prevalence of bullying and victimization: A cross-national and methodological analysis. In in Handbook of Bullying in Schools: An International Perspective, eds S. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, and D. L. Espelage (London: Routledge), 347–362.
10. Crowley, D., & Heyer, P. (2015). Communication in history: Technology, culture, society. Routledge.
11. Davis, W. L. (2020). Is There a Relationship Between the Number of Female Students Who Were Cyberbullied and the Number of Female Students Who Seriously Considered Attempting Suicide? Lincoln Memorial University Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 2-10.
12. DeSmet, A., Bastiaensens, S., Van Cleemput, K., & Poels, K. (2016). Deciding whether to look after them, to like it, or leave it: a multidimensional analysis of predictors of positive and negative bystander behavior in cyberbullying among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 398–415.
13. Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). Empathy and prosocial behaviour. Psychological Bulletin Journal, 101, 91–119.
14. Handono, S. G., Laeheem, K., & Sittichai, R. (2019). Factors related with cyberbullying among the youth of Jakarta, Indonesia. Children and Youth Services Review, 99, 235-239.‏
15. Heiman, T., & Olenik-Shemesh, D. (2016). Computer-based communication and cyberbullying involvement in the sample of Arab teenagers. Education and Information Technologies, 21(5), 1183-1196.‏
16. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2013). Social influences on cyberbullying behaviors among middle and high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 711–722.
17. Hoffman, L. M. (2008). Empathy and prosocial behavior. In J. M. Lewis, L. Haviland-Jones, & M. Feldman Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 440–454). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
18. Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and Moral Development. Implication for Caring and Justice.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Jordan, M., Amir, D., & Bloom, P. (2016). Are empathy and concern psychologically distinct? Emotion, 16, 1107–1116.
20. Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073.
21. Kowalski, R. M., Limber, S. P., & McCord, A. (2019). A developmental approach to cyberbullying: Prevalence and protective factors. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 20-32.‏
22. Li, Q. (2006). Cyberbullying in schools: A research of gender differences. School Psychology International, 27(2), 157-170.‏
23. Longobardi, C., Iotti, N. O., Jungert, T., & Settanni, M. (2018). Student-teacher relationships and bullying: The role of student status. Journal of Adolescence, 63, 1–10.
24. Machackova, H., & Pfetsch, J. (2016). Bystanders’ responses to offline bullying and cyberbullying: The role of empathy and normative beliefs about aggression. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 169-176.
25. Marin-Lopez, I., Zych, I., Ortega-Ruiz, R., Monks, C. P., & Llorent, V. J. (2020). Empathy online and moral disengagement through technology as longitudinal predictors of cyberbullying victimization and perpetration. Children and Youth Services Review,116, 105-144.
26. Martínez, J., Rodríguez-Hidalgo, A. J., & Zych, I. (2020). Bullying and cyberbullying in adolescents from disadvantaged areas: Validation of questionnaires, prevalence rates, and relationship to self-esteem, empathy and social skills. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(17), 6199.
27. Nusantara, B. A. Sugiharto, D. Y. P. & Mulawarman, M. (2020). The effects of empathy on cyberbullying mediated by moral disengagement on cyberbullying mediated by moral disengagement. Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling, 9(2), 116-122.
28. Nusantara, B. A., Sugiharto, D. Y. P., & Mulawarman, M. (2020). The effects of empathy on cyberbullying mediated by moral disengagement on cyberbullying mediated by moral disengagement. Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling, 9(2), 116-122.
29. Patton, D. U., Woolley, M. E., & Hong, J. S. (2012). Exposure to violence, student fear, and low academic achievement: African American males in the critical transition to high school. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(2), 388-395.‏
30. Peleg-Oren, N., Cardenas, G. A., Comerford, M., & Galea, S. (2012). An association between bullying behaviors and alcohol use among middle school students. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 32(6), 761–775.
31. Pfetsch, J. (2016). Who is who in cyberbullying? Conceptual and empirical perspectives on bystanders in cyberbullying, In F. Wright (Ed.), a social-ecological approach to cyberbullying (pp. 121-150). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Publishing.
32. Radoll, P. (2012). Cyber-safety and indigenous youth. Indigenous Law Bulletin, 8(12), 11–14.
33. Rodríguez-Hidalgo, A. J., Solera, E., & Calmaestra, J. (2018). Psychological predictors of cyberbullying according to ethnic-cultural origin in adolescents: A national study in Spain. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(10), 1506-1522.‏
34. Safaria, T., & Suyono, H. (2018) the role of parent-child relationship, school climate, happiness, and empathy to predict cyberbullying behavior. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education. 9(3), 548.‏
35. Santre, S. (2022). Cyberbullying in adolescents: a literature review. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, doi: 1515/ijamh-2021-0133
36. Steffgen, G., König, A., Pfetsch, J., & Melzer, A. (2011). Are cyberbullies less empathic? Adolescents' cyberbullying behavior and empathic responsiveness. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(11), 643-648.‏
37. Strohmeier, D., & Gradinger, P. (2022). Cyberbullying and cyber victimization as online risks for children and adolescents. European Psychologist, 27(2), 141–150.
38. Szuster, A. (2016). Crucial dimensions of human altruism. Affective vs. conceptual factors leading to helping or reinforcing others. Frontiers in Psychology,7, 519-520.
39. Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 277-287.‏
40. Udris, R. (2015). Cyberbullying in Japan: An exploratory study. International Journal of Cyber Society and Education, 8(2), 59-80.‏
41. Wong-Lo, M., Bullock, L. M., & Gable, R. A. (2011). Cyber bullying: Practices to face digital aggression. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 16(3), 317-325.‏
42. Wong-Lo, M., Bullock, L. M., & Gable, R. A. (2011). Cyber bullying: Practices to face digital aggression. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 16(3), 317-325.‏
43. Wright, M. F., Wachs, S., & Harper, B. D. (2018). The moderation of empathy in the longitudinal association between witnessing cyberbullying, depression, and anxiety. Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 12(4), 4-6.
44. Zych, I., Baldry, A. C., Farrington, D. P., & Llorent, V. J. (2019). Are children involved in cyberbullying low on empathy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of research on empathy versus different cyberbullying roles. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 83-97.