The Role of Strain Variables in Explaining the Attitude toward Alcohol Consumption: Case Study of University Students

Document Type : علمی - پژوهشی

Authors

• Akbar Aliverdinia
• Afagh Rostamian
• Zeinab Khakzad

University of Mazandaran, Mazandaran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jss.v12i1.17117

Abstract

Extended Abstract

1-Introduction
In recent years, the criminological community has witnessed a resurgence of interest in strain theory. “Traditional strain theory (1955, 1960, 1970) posits that individuals are pressured into crime when they are prevented from achieving cultural goals like monetary success or middleclass status through legitimate means. This goal blockage may pressure some to pursue their goal through illegitimate means” (Wang & Holtfreter, 2011, p. 5). But Strain development is largely attributable to Agnew’s (1992) formulation of general strain theory (GST).

2- Theoretical Framework
“According to GST, individuals may encounter aversive social relations in which they experience goal blockage, are presented with noxious stimuli, and/or are deprived of positively valued stimuli” (Brezina, Piquero, & Mazerolle, 2001, p. 361). “These relations tend to generate negative affect, create pressures for corrective action, and increase the likelihood of criminal/delinquent behavior” (Brezina et al., 2001, p. 361) Agnew (1992) argues that “various negative relations with others (strain or stress) lead to negative emotions and encourage some type of coping. That coping is more likely to be criminal when the strains are severe, seen as unjust, and are linked with anger” (cited in Kaufman, 2009, p. 411). “To further clarify the meaning of strain, Agnew (2001) differentiates objective strain from subjective strain. Objective strains are defined as events or conditions that are disliked by most members of a given group” (Moon, Blurton, & McCluskey, 2007, p. 584).
Numerous stressful conditions or events such as physical assault, financial difficulty, and criminal victimization can be considered objective strains. A majority of previous research on GST focused on objective strains, under the assumption that these stressful events and conditions always cause strain in all individuals. Agnew (2001), however, recognizes the importance of measuring “subjective strains,” which refer to “events or conditions that are disliked by the people who are experiencing them” (Moon et al., 2007, p. 585).
He argues that individuals evaluate objective strains differently, depending on various factors such as personal characteristics, social resources, or life circumstances, positively. Agnew, therefore, suggests the necessity of measuring both objective and subjective strains to better understand the relationship between strain and delinquency (cited in Moon et al., 2007).

3- Methodology
The current study intends to test the assumptions of Agnew’s theory (1992) among students of the University of Mazandaran. The current study tests the ability of a general theory of crime and deviance, to explain gender differences in attitude to consume alcohol. For this purpose, 467 students (309 girls and 158 boys) were selected by proportional random sampling. The data for this study were collected by questionnaire.

Measures
Failure to achieve positive goals: This variable is operationalized as the independent variable of a number of indicators such as: academic failure, financial failure, emotional breakdown, blocked goals, etc. The alpha value of the scale of failure to achieve positive goals is 0/6.
Remove positive stimulus: This variable is operationalized as the independent variable of a number of indicators such as: divorce, remarriage, illness, death, unemployment, family conflict, and suicide. The alpha value of the scale of remove positive stimulus is 0/5.
The presentation of negative stimulus: This variable is operationalized as the independent variable of a number indicators such as: neglected by the family, ignoring the talent, financial problems, injury, neglect by the teachers, negative relations, etc. The alpha value of the presentation of negative stimulus is 0/8.
Negative emotions. Agnew (1992) emphasizes anger as a “key” emotion leading to crime, but according to Agnew, more research is needed to investigate the relationships between strain, deviance, and negative emotions other than anger. In our study, respondents were asked about two negative emotions that might potentially influence the relationship between strain and attitude to consume alcohol. The alpha value of the scale of negative emotions is 0/8.
Unfavorable situation neighborhood: This variable is operationalized as the independent variable of a number of indicators such as: theft in the neighborhood, drug use in the neighborhood, insecurity in the neighborhood, vandalism in the neighborhood, etc. The alpha value of the scale of unfavorable situation neighborhood is 0/7.
Attitude to consume alcohol: Attitude to consume alcohol is considered as the dependent variable. This variable has three indexes. Cognitive attitude to consume alcohol, emotional attitude to consume alcohol, and behavioral attitude to consume alcohol. The alpha value of the scale of attitude to consume alcohol: is 0/8.

4- Results & Discussion
We examined the linkages between strain, negative emotions, and attitude to consume alcohol among students of the University of Mazandaran. The results of this study are consistent with much prior research in gender differences about attitude to consume alcohol. However, this study do not confirm the strain theory. Among different variables of strain theory such as failure to achieve positively valued goals, removal of positively valued stimuli, unfavorable situation neighborhood, anger and depression, just presence of negative stimuli and anger were confirmed.

5- Suggestions
Future research should focus on other variables such as self-esteem, self-control, and social and emotional protection. Agnew argues that “strain, when perceived as unjust, high in magnitude (i.e., duration, recently, and centrality), associated with low social control, is more likely to be related to delinquent behaviors” (Moon et al., 2007, p. 583).

Key words:Anger, Depression, Failure to achieve positively valued goals, Unfavorable situation neighborhood, Removal of positively valued stimuli, Cognitive attitude, Emotional attitude, Behavioral attitude.

Keywords

• Anger
• depression
• Failure to achieve positively valued goals
• Unfavorable situation neighborhood
• Removal of positively valued stimuli
• Cognitive attitude
• Emotional attitude
• Behavioral attitude

References

1. اسمیت، ا؛ مکی، د. (1392). روان‌شناسی اجتماعی. (ا. اسدی، ط. باغانی، م. حلی ساز، م. سپاه منصور، م. ساعدی، م. فراهانی و ز. سادات لاریجانی، مترجمان). چاپ اول، تهران: وانیا.

2. بیکر، ترز ال. (1386). نحوۀ انجام تحقیقات اجتماعی. (ه. نایبی). چاپ دوم. تهران: نشر نی.

3. پاشا شریقی، ح. (1389). اصول روان‌سنجی و روان‌آزمایی. چاپ نهم. تهران: انتشارات رشد.

4. دواس، دی. ای. (1387). پیمایش در تحقیقات اجتماعی. (ه. نایبی، مترجم). چاپ دهم. تهران: نشر نی.

5. خانی مقدم، ر؛ شجاعی‌زاده، ح؛ جعفری، د؛ خاکی، ن. (1390). بررسی فراوانی و علل گرایش به مصرف قلیان، سیگار و الکل در دانشجویان دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران. نخستین کنگره بین المللی و چهارمین کنگره ملی آموزش بهداشت و ارتقای سلامت. 26الی 29 اردیبهشت ماه. ایران- تبریز.

6. سراج زاده، ح؛ فیضی، ا. (1386). عوامل اجتماعی مؤثر بر مصرف تریاک و مشروبات الکلی در بین دانشجویان. نامۀ علوم اجتماعی. دورۀ جدید. شمارۀ پیاپی 31. صص 102- 81.

7. علیوردی نیا، ا؛ ریاحی، م. ا؛ موسوی، چ. م. (1386). مطالعۀ جامعه‌شناختی بزهکاری: آزمون تجربی نظریۀ فشار عمومی اگنو. مجلّۀ جامعه‌شناسی ایران. 2 (8). صص 111-83.

8. علیوردی نیا، ا. همتی، ا. (1391). تحلیل اجتماعی گرایش به مصرف مشروبات الکلی در میان دانشجویان دانشکدۀ علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه تهران. راهبرد اجتماعی و فرهنگی. ( 7). صص 102- 77.

9. علیوردی نیا، ا؛ خاکزاد، ز. (1392). تبیین تفاوت‌های جنسیتی در رفتارهای انحرافی بر اساس نظریۀ فشار عمومی. مجلّۀ جامعه‌شناسی ایران. 14 (4). صص 137-91.

10. کاوسیان، ج؛ شیخ‌فینی، ع؛ حاتمی، م؛ مردانی، ح. (1391). بررسی عوامل حفاظت‌کننده و خطرزای مصرف مواد (تریاک، مشروبات الکلی، سیگار و قلیان) در دانشجویان دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی بندرعباس. فصل‌نامۀ علمی پژوهشی دانش انتظامی. 13 (53). صص 208-181.

11. Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Journal of Criminology, 30)1(, 47-87.

12. Agnew, R., Brezina, T., Wright, P., & Cullen, J. (2002). Strain,personality traits, and delinquency: Extending general strain theory. Journal of Criminogy, 40, 43-71.

13. Anne Francis, K. (2007). Gender differences in delinquency and health risk behaviors: A test of general strain theory (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas, USA.

14. Ardwan Menses, R. (2009). A cross-cultural test of social learning, self-control, social bonding, and general strain theories of crime and deviance. (Unpublished master’s thesis). American University of Washington, USA.

15. Asselin, N. (2009). Using general strain theory to understand drug and alcohol use in Canada: An examination of how strain, its conditioning variables, and gender are interrelated (Unpublished master’s thesis). Queen’s University Kingston, Canada.

16. Bao, W., Haas, A., & Pi, Y. (2004). Life strain, negative emotions, and delinquency: An empirical test of general strain theory for the people in the Republic of China. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(3), 281-297.

17. Belshaw, S., & Rodriguez, J. (2010). General strain theory: A comparative analysis of Latin and white youth. The Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice, 7(2), 138-158.

18. Brezina, T., Piquero, A., & Mazerolle, P. (2001). Student, anger and aggressive behavior in school: An initial test of a new macro- level strain theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38(4), 362-386.

19. Broidy, L., & Agnew, R. (1997). Gender and crime: A general strain theory perspective. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 3(43), 275-306.

20. Carson, C. (2007). Using agnew's general strain theory to explain the relationship between early victimization and deviant behavior (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of South Florida, USA.

21. Coster, S., & Cornell Zito, R. (2010). Experiences and expressions gender and general strain theory: The gendering of emotional. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26(2), 224–245.

22. Froggio, G., Zamaro, N., & Lori, M. (2009). Exploring the relationship between strain and some neutralization techniques. European Journal of Criminology, 6(1), 73–88.

23. Higgins, E., Piquero, L., & Piquero, R. (2011). General strain theory, peer rejection, and delinquency/crime. Youth & Society, 43(4), 1272–1297.

24. Jang, S., & Johnso, B. (2005). Gender religiosity, and reaction to strain among African Americans. The Sociological Quarterly, 46, 323–357.

25. Kaufman, J. (2009). Gendered responses to serious strain: The argument for a general strain theory of deviance. Justice Quarterly, 26(3), 411-444.

26. Lee, R., & Cohen, W. (2008). Examining strain in a school context. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 6(2), 115-135.

27. Lorente, F., Peretti-Watel, P., Griffet, J., & Grelot, L. (2013). Alcohol use and intoxication in sport university students. Oxford Journals, Medicine, Alcohol and Alcoholism, 38(5), 427-430.

28. Moon, B., Blurton, D., & McCluskey, J. (2007). General strain theory and delinquency: Focusing on the influences of key strain characteristics on delinquency. Crime & Delinquency, 54(4), 582-613.

29. Siegel, L. (1998). Criminology. London: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

30. Slocum, L. (2010). General strain theory and continuity in offending over time: Assessing and extending GST explanations of persistence. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26(2), 204–223.

31. Velazquez, C., Poulos, N., Latimer, L., & Pasch, K. (2012). Associations between energy drink consumption and alcohol use behaviors among college students. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 123(1), 167–172.

32. Wang, X., & Holtfreter, K. (2011). The effects of corporation- and industry-level strain and opportunity on corporate crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 3(8), 1-35.