Application of simulation techniques in social sciences: A critical study

Document Type : علمی - پژوهشی

Author

• Ahmadreza Asgharpour-Masouleh

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

https://doi.org/10.22067/jss.v11i2.18642

Abstract

Social simulation includes a set of techniques and tools for modeling social phenomena in such a way that testing and doing artificial experiments are possible. Modern computational and programming tools have made it possible for social researchers, along with other disciplines, to open new perspectives in sociology, both in theory and method. Although technical development in computational tools has a short history, but the need for social simulation can be traced to the first decades of the last century. In a typology, the techniques of social simulation may be categorized as follows: system dynamics, queuing models, microsimulaiton, cellular automata, and agent-based modeling. These five could be put in two general categories: process-based techniques (the first two) and agent-based techniques (the last three). It seems that among all of these techniques, agent-based modeling can satisfy some of the most important considerations of social researchers. Considerations like agent heterogeneity, interaction, learning, agent-environment interaction and emergence of macro patterns from micro actions. Although social simulation, in general, and agent-based modeling, in particular, are in their first years of maturity, and some of important critics have remained unanswered, but it seems that potentially they can add new and efficient views to the sociology.

Keywords

• social simulation
• agent-based modeling
• microsimulation
• cellular automata
• queuing models

References

1. Arthur, B. W. (1999). “Complexity and the Economy”. Science, 2 April 1999. 284. pp 107-109.

2. Axelrod, R. (2001). The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and collaboration. Princeton University Press.

3. Axtell, R. L. (2007). “What Economic Agents Do: How Cognition and Interaction Lead to Emergence and Complexity”. Review of Austrian Economics. 20. Pp 105-122.

4. Babbie, E. (2008). The basic of social research. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

5. Barreteau, O; Bousquet, F; Millier, C; Weber, J. (2004). “Suitability of Multi-Agent Simulations to Study Irrigated System Viability: Application to Case Studies in the Senegal River Valley”. Agricultural Systems. 80. 3. Pp 255-275.

6. Becu, N; Perez, P; Walker, A; Barreteau, O and Le Page, C. (2003). “Agent Based Simulation of a Small Catchment Water Management in Northern Thailand: Description of the CATCHSCAPE Model”. Ecological Modelling. 170. 2-3. Pp 319-331.

7. Boudon, R. (1970). L’analyse Math´ematiques des Faits Sociaux. 2nd edn. Paris: Plon.

8. Casti, J. (1999). The computer as a laboratory: toward a theory of complex. adaptive systems. Complexity. 4(5). pp 12–14.

9. Chung, C. A. (2003). Simulation modeling handbook: A practical approach. CRC press. Boca Raton. FL.

10. Colander, D; Howitt, P; Kirman, A; Leijonhufvud, A; Mehrling, P. (2008). “Beyond DSGE Models: Toward an Empirically Based Macroeconomics”. American Economic Review. 98. 2. Pp 236-240.

11. Coleman, J.S. (1962). “Analysis of social structures and simulation of social processes with electronic computers”. in Simulation in Social Science. (ed. H. Guetzkow). Prentice Hall. Englewood Cliffs. NJ. pp. 63–69.

12. Coleman, J.S. (1964). Introduction to Mathematical Sociology. ., New York: MacMillan Publishing

13. CoDosi, G; Fagiolo, G. and Roventini, A. (2006). “An Evolutionary Model of Endogenous Business Cycles”. Computational Economics. 27. Pp 1. 3-34.

14. Durlauf, S. N. (1998). “What Should Policymakers Know About Economic Complexity?”. The Washington Quarterly. 21. 1. Pp 157-165.

15. `Epstein, J. M. (2006). Generative Social Science. Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

16. Epstein, J. M and Axtell, R. (1996). Growing Artificial Societies. Social Science from the Bottom Up. Cambridge: MA, The MIT Press.

17. Fararo, T. J. and Hummon, N. P. (2005). “The Emergence of Computational Sociology”. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 20. 2-3. Pp 79-87.

18. Frank, U; Squazzoni, F and Troitzsch, K. G. (2009). “EPOS-Epistemological Perspectives on Simulation: An Introduction”. in F. Squazzoni (ed.). Epistemological Aspects of Computational Social Science.

19. Giere, R. N. )1999.( Science without Laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

20. Gilbert, N. (2002). "Varieties of Emergence. in D. Sallach (ed.). Social Agents: Ecology, Exchange, and Evolution. Agent 2002 Conference. Chicago: University of Chicago and Argonne National Laboratory. Pp 41-56.

21. Gilbert, N. (2008). Agent-Based Models. London: Sage Publications.

22. Gilbert, N. and Abbott, A. (2005). "Introduction". American Journal of Sociology. 110 (4).Pp. 859–863.

23. Gilbert, N. and K. Troitzsch.(1999). Simulation for the Social Scientist. Buckingham: Open University Press.

24. Gilbert, N. and Troitzsch, K.G. (2005). Simulation for the Social Scientist.2nd ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

25. Hanneman, R. A.(1988). Computer-Assisted Theory Biulding. Modeling Dynamic Social Systems. Sage: Newbury Park. CA.

26. Harding, A. (ed.).(1996). Microsimulation and public policy. Contributions to economic policy. vol. 232. Elsevier.Amsterdam.

27. Hedström, P.(2005).Dissecting the Social. On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge: MA, Cambridge University Press.

28. Heise, D. R. and Simmons, R. G. (1985). Some computer-based developments in sociology. Science. 228. Pp 428–433.

29. Kreutzer, W. (1986). System simulation. Programming styles and languages .Sydney: Addison-Wesley.

30. Lansing, J. S; Kremer, J. N. (1993). “Emergent Properties of Balinese Water Temple Networks: Coadaptation on a Rugged Fitness Landscape”. American Anthropologist. 95. 1. Pp 97-114.

31. Manicas, P. (2006). A Realist Philosophy of Social Science: Explanation and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

32. Miller, J. H; Page, S. E. (2007). Complex Adaptive System. An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

33. Orcutt, G. H & et al. (eds). (1986) Microanalytic simulation models to support social and financial policy. Informamtion research and resource reports. vol. 7. North-Holland. Amsterdam.

34. Pancs, R and Vriend, N.bJ. (2007). “Schelling’s Spatial Proximity Model of Segregation Revisited”. Journal of Public Economics. 91. 1-2, pp 1-24.

35. Pingle, M and Tesfatsion, L. (2003). Evolution of Worker-Employer Networks and Behaviors under Alternative Non-Employment Benefits: An Agent-Based Computational Study. in A. Nagurney (ed.) Innovations in Financial and Economic Networks. Cheltenham. Uk: Edward Elgar.

36. Pyka, A. and Hanush, H. (eds.) (2006). Applied Evolutionary Economics and the Knowledge-Based Economy. Cheltenham. UK: Edward Elgar.

37. Railsback, Steven F. & Grimm, V. (2011). Agent-Based and Individual-Based Modeling: A Practical Introduction. Princeton University Press.

38. Richiardi, M. (2004). “A Search Model of Unemployment and Firm Dynamics”. Advances in Complex Systems. vol. 7. no. 2.

39. Schelling, T. (1971). “Dynamic models of segregation”. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 1. Pp 143–186.

40. Schelling, T. (1978). Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: W. W. Norton.

41. Simon, H.(1969). The Sciences of the Artificial.The MIT Press. Cambridge: MA.

42. Terano, T. (2005). Agent-based Simulation: From Modeling Methodologies to Real-world applications Springer.

43. Troitzsch, K. G. )1997(. "Social Science Simulation: Origins, Prospects, Purposes." in Conte, Hegselmann and Terna. pp 41-54.

44. Troitzsch, K. G .(2009). "Multi-Agent Systems and Simulation: A Survey from an Application Perspective". in A. M. Uhrmacher and D. Weyns (eds.). Multi-Agent Systems. Simulation and Applications. Boca Raton. FL. CRC Press. pp 53-75.

45. Zeigler, B. P. )1985.( Theory of modeling and simulation. pp. 125-196.

46. Zhang, J. )2004( "A Dynamic Model of Residential Segregation. "Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 28. Pp 147-170.