Food, Gender, and Power: An Ethnographic Study of Lak Nomads of Lorestan Province

Document Type : علمی - پژوهشی

Authors

• Mohammad Chaghalvand ¹
• Nasrin Omidvar ²
• AbouAli Vedadhir ³
• Jalaleddin Rafifar ³

¹ Lorestan Cultural Heritage, Handcraft and Tourism Organization, Khorramabad

² Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran

³ University of Tehran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jss.v15i2.57468

Abstract

Extended Abstract1. IntroductionFood and nutrition, whether before or after consumption, play a role of utmost importance in forming and maintaining cultural characteristics of humans. Economic, cultural, and social factors and conditions could affect the access and control of food products as well as meeting various tastes in this regard. Similar to signs, food and the manner of its consumption could reflect cultural implications about humans. Alongside the aforementioned components, gender and power are also considered social factors which influence populations’ foodways, i.e. the types of production, distribution, and consumption of food products. Food and the manner of consumption demonstrate one’s economic and cultural capitals; albeit they are also linked to the human physique along with cultural significance and implications on another level. As a sociocultural consideration of the human physique, gender is represented within the food system in various ways, exploiting food related capacities to show a cultural reflection of genders in such depictions. As a result, food alongside its significance and implications are constantly present and influential in the modern cultural world. As a general description, the present study seeks to provide answers to the following main questions with focus on the notions of power and gender involved within the food system: first, how do various components of power and gender influence the role of nomadic men and women, regarding the local food system of Lak nomads who live in Lorestan province, Iran, in various stages of food production, provision, and consumption? And second, what are the differences and diversities between men and women’s power with respect to controlling, providing, and consuming food products? 2. Theoretical FrameworkFood and human nutrition have always been the focus of anthropologists. Within an evolutionist approach framework, Lewis Henry Morgan pointed out that the history of the evolution of human societies could be identified from the early phases to late stages, according to the techniques used for gaining access to food resource. In fact, humans’ skills in gaining access to food as well as their ability to control food resources and processing them has resulted in the distinction and superiority of human beings over other animals. A symbolic approach to food could be traced within humans’ cultural lifetime and the beliefs of pioneering anthropologists. In this regard, James Frazer could be mentioned in particular, who narrates the symbolic applications of food and its resources in different aspects of human life among diverse nations, cultures, and societies. The difference in food-related preferences and tastes in all dimension, formed through the habitus of various classes and strata, is regarded by Pierre Bourdieu as a means for identifying distinctions as well as the reproduction of hierarchies and differences. At a macro level, food could also be a sign of power or weakness of various social strata. In his book, Bourdieu points out that similar to their tastes in music, arts, and clothing, the wealthy exploit food to assert distinction from lower strata. Such an influence of food is reminded by Mainz as sweetness and power through his works. These approaches are used in the present study as a set of inspiring, sensitizing ideas and beliefs, so as to provide a closer understanding of the subject at hand. 3. MethodObtaining answers and a clear image of posed questions require a long, profound exploration of the culture being studied. Since ethnography seeks to understand intended phenomena through the perspective of those who are closely related to the subject, it is used in this study as the appropriate method for discerning the significance and implications that bring about gender and its interpretations among nomads. The research strategy of ethnography is used as a means to understand the significance and living environment through the views of actors who gain access to the living experiences of nomads and obtain the intended meanings. For data collection, ethnographic interviews and a participatory observation of employed techniques are required. As James Spradley had intended, the ethnography in this study is used as a process involving endless cycles of reviewing and dealing with new questions that introduce tremendous dynamism and flexibility to ethnography, in line with collecting massive data so as to reach a thorough understanding of the subject at hand. 4. Results and DiscussionFindings show that in the studied society, food involves numerous symbolic and sociocultural levels and applications. In this society, food is considered as a component in which countless implications are present in various dimensions of the society’s sociocultural life. Gender is a significant component in food production, distribution, and consumption, which has brought about a different form of power to women regarding access and consumption of food products. Being close to food products and resources is an important symbol for women. Additionally, the food system is an important element for demonstrating gender-related features of a culture during the stages of production, distribution, and consumption. In case of the society studied in this inquiry, women and their extent of influence in family are expressed majorly through the extent of power and authority over the management of food resources, which could be bestowed upon their relatives (esp. female members) by women as a gift. Men employ the strategy of arranging parties and catering in order to obtain influence, power, and social status. Food is used by both men and women in various ways to gain access to a social base, friendly relationships, and power.5. ConclusionFood is an effective means to build distinctive identities for men and women. Such distinct, gender-related identities have offered different levels of access and relations for men and women with respect to food. In a nomadic society, the empowerment of gender-related norms could be seen in daily interactions involving the food system; norms that, the majority of times, are reflective of biological differences and their implications. The impact of gender and its implications can always be seen on how men and women are present in such a food system along with the extent of their powers.

Keywords

• *

20.1001.1.20081383.1397.15.2.2.7

References

1. امان‌الهی بهاروند، س. (1370). قوم لر ،پژوهشی درباره پیوستگی قومی وپراکندگی جغرافیای لرها. تهران: آگاه.

2. ایزدپناه، ح. (1367). فرهنگ لکی. تهران: مؤسسه فرهنگی جهان‌گیری.

3. بلیکی، ن. (1389). طراحی پژوهش‌های اجتماعی. ترجمة حسن چاوشیان. تهران: نی.

4. بوردیو، پ. (1390). تمایز، نقد اجتماعی قضاوت‌های ذوقی. ترجمة حسن چاوشیان. تهران: ثالث.

5. راولینسون، ه. ک. (1362). سفرنامة راولینسون: گذر از زهاب به خوزستان. ترجمة سکندر امان‌اللهی بهاروند، تهران: آگاه.

6. ریویر، ک. (1382). انسان‌شناسی سیاسی. ترجمة ناصر فکوهی. تهران: نی.

7. فریزر، ج. ج. (1383). شاخة زرین. ترجمة کاظم فیروزمندی. تهران: آگاه.

8. گیدنز، آ. (1386). جامعه‌شناسی. ترجمه حسن چاوشیان. تهران: نی.

9. مستوفی، ح. (1381). تاریخ گزیده. به اهتمام دکتر عبدالحسین نوایی. تهران: امیرکبیر.

10. مورگان، ل. ه. (1389). جامعة باستان. ترجمة محسن ثلاثی. تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.

11. Anonby. E. (2004). Kurdish or Luri? Laki's disputed identity in the Luristan province of Iran. Kurdish Studies, 4(5), 7-22.

12. Barthes, R. (2013). Toward a psychosociology of contemporary food consumption. In. C. Counihan., P. V. Esterik (Eds.). Food and culture: A reader (pp. 37-44). New York. Routledge.

13. Bourdieu, P. (2013). Distinction: a social critique of the judgment of test. In. C. Counihan., & P. V. Esterik (Eds.). Food and culture: A reader (pp. 31-39). New York. Routledge.

14. Brown, J. L. (2006). Intra-family Influences on food choice at mid-life. In R. Shepherd, & R. ‎Monique. (Eds). The psychology of food choice (pp. 263- 289). Cambridge, MA: CABI.

15. Brown, J. L. (2006). Intra-family influences on food choice at mid-life. In R. Shepherd, & M. Raats, (Eds.), The psychology of food choice (pp. 263–288). Cambridge, MA: CABI.

16. Buiatti, S. (2011). Food and tourism. the role of “SLOW FOOD” association. In K. L. Sidali, A. Spiller., & B. Schulze (Eds.), Food, agriculture and tourism. Linking local gastronomy and rural tourism (pp. 92- 102). Heidelberg: Springer.

17. Bynum, C. W. (1987). Holy feast and holy Fast: The religious significance of food to medieval women. University of California Press.

18. Counihan, C. K. (2004). Introduction- food and gender: Identity and power. In C. K. Counihan, & S. L. Kaplan. (Eds.), Food and gender identity and power (pp. 1-11). Amsterdam: Routledge. .

19. Counihan, C. M., & Kaplan, S. L. (2004). Food and gender identity and power. Amsterdam: Routledge.

20. Denscombe, M. (2010). The good research guide for small-scale social research projects. London: Open University Press.

21. Fischler, C. (1988). Food, self and identity. Social Science Information, 27(2), 275-292.

22. Given, L. M. (2006). The sage encyclopedia of qualitative research. London: Sage.

23. Goody, J. (1982). Cooking, cuisine and class: A study in comparative sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

24. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson P. (2007). Ethnography principles in practice (3rd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library.

25. Harris, M. (2013). The abominable pig. In C. K. Counihan, & P. Van Esterik. (Eds.), Food and culture: A reader (pp. 59-72). New York: Routledge.

26. Kahn, M. (1986). Always hungry, giver Greedy: Food and the expression of gender in a Melanesian society. New York. Cambridge University Press.

27. Leech, N. L. & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2008). Qualitative data analysis: A compendium of techniques and a framework for selection for school psychology research and beyond. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(4), 587–604.

28. Mead, M. (2013). Why do we overeat?. In C. K. Counihan, & P. Van Esterik. (Eds), Food and culture: A reader (pp.19- 23). New York: Routledge.

29. Mintz, S. W. (1985). Sweetness and power. New York: Penguin.

30. Mitchell, R. D., Hall, C. M., & McIntosh, A. J. (2003). Wine tourism and consumer behavior. In, R. D. Mitchell., C. M. Hall., & A. J. McIntosh. (Eds.), Wine tourism around the world: Development, management and markets (pp. 60- 81). Oxford. Butterworth-Heinemann.

31. Moore, H. L. (1988). Feminism anthropology. Minneapolis University of Minnesota Press.

32. Parkin, K. J. (2006). Food is love: Advertising and gender roles in modern America. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

33. Pfluger-Schindlbeck, I. (2010). The continuity of life: Food, gender, and kinship in Azerbaijan. In P. Berger (ed.), Anthropology of values: Essays in honor of Georg Pfeffer (pp. 49- 59). Delhi: Pearson Longman.

34. Salisbury J. E. (2001). Encyclopedia of women in the ancient world. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.

35. Scholliers, P. (2001). Food, drink and identity cooking, eating and drinking in Europe since the middle ages. New York: Oxford.

36. Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

37. Weismantel, M. J. (1988). Food, gender and poverty in the Ecuadorean Andes. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.