Document Type : علمی - پژوهشی

Authors

1 Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

2 University of Tabriz

3 Islamic Azad University of Tabriz

Abstract

Extended Abstract
1. Introduction
Co-existence is a mental-behavioral state held in common with members of a society, within which others are accepted as legitimate and equal-right partners. Becoming a common practice, co-existence can increase the level of corporation and social participation and reconcile the senses of value conflicts in the society. Because of inter and intra-societal diversities and complexities of social relations, social co-existence (its creation or maintenance) has become one of the main issues or challenges in contemporary social studies. Co-existence, like any other behavior, is socially learned (or thought) by the agents of socialization from the infancy. Among others, some of social and familial factors could promote the sense and practice of co-existence among students. The present study aimed at studying the level of social co-existence and some of its related social factors among pre-university students of Tabriz city.
2. Theoretical Framework
Existing theoretical and empirical literature emphasized on various factors as promoters of co-existence. Putnam, emphasized on social capital as a main determinant (cited in Colman, 1994), and Sharepour and et al (2009) in an empirical study found out that social capital is among the main determinants of co-existence. Ghaith (2002), Hastings (2004), and Khosh Konesh (2010) showed that social support has significant impact on social co-existence. Socialization, parental style and familial atmosphere are among influencing factors of co-existence, especially among youngsters. Rastgaran (2014) observed evident relationships between these variables and co-existence.
According to the theoretical and empirical frameworks, three main hypotheses have been examined, including:
• Increases in social capital can positively affect the level of co-existence among students;
• Social support can positively impact the level of co-existence among students;
• And, the quality of familial relationships can affect the level of co-existence among students.

3. Methodology
The present study is an applied research and has been done utilizing the survey method. The study utilizes first-hand data gathered by the use of questionnaire. The sample, 360 students, are chosen from all pre-university female students of Tabriz city in the studying year 2013-14 (around 5866) by the use of Chochran's sampling formula and multi-stage stratified sampling technique.
4. Findings
Reviewing descriptive statistics and taking students' majors into account, around 30.2 percent of them were studying mathematics, and 24.7, 39.7, and 5.5 percent were studying humanities, medicine and arts, respectively. Mean grade point average for the students was 16.58 (SE= 2.13). Mean score for social co-existence is 67.78 (Min 8.75; Max 96.25), indicating a relatively high score by itself.
Results for testing the three mentioned hypotheses, show that all three independent variables; namely social support (r= 0.359), social capital (r= 0.305), and quality of familial relationship (r= 0.134) are positively and significantly related to the level of co-existence. Therefore, it could be concluded that those student who experience more social support, have higher levels of social capital, and have qualified familial relationships, have got higher scores of co-existence, too.
5. Summary and Conclusion
Findings of the study show that, those students with higher levels of social support, compared to others have got higher scores on co-existence index. Creation and promotion of this sense, in one sense, will depend on awareness of the parents and school administrators of this effect.
Further efforts to promote the sense of co-existence among students will be improvement of social capital. As students develop extensive and trusted social ties with their peers, family members, and acquaintances, they will experience higher levels of the sense of co-existence at school, as well.
Another promoting factor with respect to social co-existence among students is the quality of their familial relationships. Findings show that quality of the relationship between students and their parents, can affect their experienced level of co-existence. Higher levels of co-existence are seen among students who have their parental relationships based on mutual understanding, while students with non-corporative parental relationships, and have shown lower levels of co-existence at school.
Findings clearly indicated that family and familial experiences have a crucial role in formation of the social co-existence. Those students who are given rationalized support; and are given proper love and care; and are given the sense of self-worth by their parents, can count on their family and parents in all stages and matters of their lives and foster the sense of companionship and learn to abandon some of their personal desires in favor of others. Children via having these mentioned characteristics in their relationships (which are first, fostered by the family), will be able to motivate the higher levels of the sense of social co-existence, when entering into the social life. Therefore, to foster the sense of co-existence among students, parents used to be informed and even educated, with respect to the role of parental relationships on children's social and academic experiences.
On the other hand, schools' administrators can encourage the sense of empathy among students by fostering interactional friendship, mutual respect, and corporation in educational affairs. This will pave the road for promotion of the sense of social co-existence among students, via instructing them to establish good social relationships; strengthening the sense of self control; increasing their awareness of rights and responsibilities; realizing their strengths and weaknesses; and understanding their similarities and differences from others. Furthermore, because of the personal differences among students in terms of intelligence, personality characteristics, family background, etc, schools and teachers can further increase the level of social co-existence among students by making use of participatory teaching methods. This will lead to enhancement of inter and intra-group relationships among students and promote the sense of tolerance and co-existence in a practical manner.

Keywords

1. آذین، ا و موسوی، م. (1390). بررسی رابطۀ عوامل آموزشگاهی بر سازگاری اجتماعی دانش آموزان مقطع متوسطۀ شهرستان فریدون شهر. مجلّۀ جامعه‌شناسی کاربردی، 22 (1)، 200-183.
2. انوری، ح. (1382). فرهنگ فشردۀ سخن. تهران: انتشارات سخن.
3. بیرو، آ. (1380). فرهنگ علوم اجتماعی. (ب. ساروخانی، مترجم). تهران: نشر کیهان.
4. تاجبخش، ک. (1384). سرمایۀ اجتماعی: اعتماد، دموکراسی و توسعه. تهران: نشر شیراز.
5. تریاندیس، ه. (1383). فرهنگ و رفتار اجتماعی. (ن. فتی، مترجم). تهران: نشر رسانش.
6. چلبی، م. (1375). جامعه‌شناسی نظم: تشریح و تحلیل نظری نظم اجتماعی. تهران: نشر نی.
7. خدمتگزار خوشدل، م. (1379). بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر عزّت نفس (با تأکید بر حمایت اجتماعی) مطالعۀ موردی دانشجویان کارشناسی روزانۀ دانشگاه تبریز. پایان‌نامۀ منتشر‌نشدۀ کارشناسی ارشد جامعه شناسی دانشگاه تبریز. تبریز، ایران.
8. خوش کنش، ا.، اسدی، م.، شیرعلی پور، ا. و کشاورز افشار، ح. (1389). نقش نیازهای بنیادین و حمایت اجتماعی در سازگاری اجتماعی دانش‌آموزان مقطع متوسطه. فصل‌نامۀ روان‌شناسی کاربردی. 4 ،(1)، 94-82.
9. رستگاران، م. (1372). بررسی تأثیر چگونگی روابط والدین بر سازگاری اجتماعی دانش‌آموزان پایۀ سوّم مدارس دخترانۀ شهر همدان. پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد جامعه‌شناسی. دانشگاه تربیت معلم تهران. تهران، ایران.
10. ساروخانی، ب. (1375). درآمدی بر دایره‌المعارف علوم اجتماعی. جلد دوم. تهران: انتشارات کیهان.
11. شارع پور، م. (1389). جامعه‌شناسی آموزش‌و‌پرورش. تهران: سمت.
12. شارع پور، م.، آزاد ارمکی، ت و عسکری، ع. (1388). بررسی رابطۀ سرمایۀ اجتماعی با مدارا در بین دانشجویان دانشکده‏های علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه‌های تهران و طباطبایی. مجلّۀ جامعه‌شناسی ایران، 10 (1). 98-64
13. صادقی، ف. (1389). بررسی رابطۀ هوش هیجانی با سازگاری، اضطراب و افسردگی دختران نوجوان مشکین شهر. پایان‌نامۀ منشرنشدۀ کارشناسی ارشد جامعه‌شناسی دانشگاه آزاد تبریز. تبریز، ایران.
14. علی پور، ا. (1385). ارتباط حمایت اجتماعی با شاخص‏های ایمنی بدن در افراد سالم: بررسی مدل تأثیر لکی. فصل‌نامۀ روا‌ن‌پزشکی، روان‌شناسی بالینی و بهداشت روان، 12 (2) 140-134.
15. علی پور، ف.، سجادی، ح.، ستاره فروزان، آ. و بیگلریان، ا. (1388). نقش حمایت‏های اجتماعی در کیفیت زندگی سالمندان. فصل‌نامۀ رفاه اجتماعی. 9 (33)، 165-147.
16. فیلد، ج. (1384). سرمایۀ اجتماعی. (ج. متقی، مترجم). تهران: مؤسسۀ علمی‌پژوهشی تأمین اجتماعی.
17. قرایی مقدم، ا. (1382). انسان‌شناسی فرهنگی. تهران: انتشارات ابجد.
18. قندهاری زاده، ا. و آقا محمدیان شعر باف، ح. ر. (1385). بررسی رابطۀ بین حمایت اجتماعی (خانواده و دوستان) و سلامت روانی نوجوان. پایان‌نامۀ منتشرنشدۀ کارشناسی ارشد روان‌شناسی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد. مشهد، ایران.
19. گشتاسبی، پ. (1386). بررسی میزان هم‌زیستی گروه‌های قومی شهرستان گچساران. پایان‌نامۀ منتشرنشدۀ کارشناسی ارشد جامعه‌شناسی دانشگاه آزاد تبریز. تبریز، ایران.
20. گولد، ج. و کولب، و. (1376). فرهنگ علوم اجتماعی. (م. ج. زاهدی، مترجم). تهران: انتشارات مازیار.
21. ممتاز، ف. (1381). انحراف اجتماعی. تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار.
22. Coleman, J. (1994). Social Capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94,95-120
23. Fuents, J., Peralta, F., & Sanchez, M. (2006). Social-personal values and coexistence problems in secondary education. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 4, 171-200. Retrieved from: http:// www. investigacion psicopedagogica. org / revista/ articulos/ 9/ english/ Art_9_118.pdf
24. Ghaith, G. M. (2002). The relationship between cooperative learning, perception of social support, and academic achievement.:The relationship between cooperative learning, perception of social support, and academic achievement. System, 30(3), 263 -273
25. Laura, J. F, Graham, J.R., & Naomi.S. (2007). Social support, self – esteem, and stress as predictors of adjustment to university among first- year under graduates. Journal of College Student Development, 48(3), 256-274.
26. Minow, M. (2002). Education for coexistence. Arizona Law Review, 44(1). Retrieved from: www.emory.edu www.Law.arizona.edu.
27. Saloviita, T., Italinna, M., & leinonen, E. (2003). Explaining the parental stress of fathers and mothers caring for a child with intellectual disability: A double ABCX model. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47, 300-312.
28. White, N., & Hastings, R.P. (2004). Social and professional support for parents of adolescents with severe intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17, 181- 190.
CAPTCHA Image