Document Type : *

Authors

1 PhD Candidate in Economical Sociology and Development, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of English, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

The concept of sexuality plays an important role in the formation of values ​​of the modern world and current Iran. Despite the importance and changes in sexuality, little attention has been paid to this theoretical field. This study is a narrative review of the most important theoretical approaches to sexuality and its essence. The method used in this article is narrative review and has been done in six states; Identifying credible sources, categorizing sexuality theories, selecting and introducing the most cited theories, identifying commonalities and differentiating of theories, synthesis theories based on their commonalities and logical compatibility, and evaluating theories. After investigating the literature, the researchers found that Michel Foucault (1929-1984) is the most important and influential theorist in sexuality. Generally, theoretical approaches to sexuality included “Gay Liberation Theories”, Theories of “Sexuality Constructionism”, “Queer Theories”, and “Transgender Theories”. Regarding the mentioned theoretical approaches, sexuality is defined as a set of values, rules, and social beliefs about sex. Sexuality is social construction, or inherent sexual orientation of individuals. Furthermore, capitalist economic system and its developmental plans have shaped Western sexuality. The sexuality in the modern times resulted in the reproduction control, family-system control and the definition of distinct sexual identities. These consequences, on the one hand, leads to sexual repression and on the other, makes sex the nodal point of modern discourses. After evaluating theories of sexuality, it is understood that the theories proposed after Foucault are an extension of his concepts. These theories have been formed in response to marginal sex/gender groups and issues.
 
 

Keywords

  1. آزاد ارمکی، ت.، شریفی ساعی، م.، و ایثاری، م. (1390). سنخ‌شناسی الگوهای روابط جنسی پیش از ازدواج در ایران. مجله جامعه‌پژوهی فرهنگی؛ پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، 2(2)، 1-34.
  2. باتلر، ج. (1385). آشفتگی جنسیتی (ا. قضایی، مترجم). نشر مجله شعر.
  3. باومن، ز. (1397). عشق سیال (ع. ثابتی، مترجم). تهران: ققنوس.
  4. بودیار، ژ. (1395). فوکو را فراموش کن (پ. یزدانجو، مترجم). تهران، نشر مرکز.
  5. پوستر، م. (1380). فوکو و استبداد یونان. در د. هوی، فوکو در بوته نقد (پ. یزدانجو، مترجم). تهران: نشر مرکز.
  6. خواجه نوری، ب.، روحانی، ع.، و هاشمی، س. (1391). گرایش به حجاب و سبک‌های متفاوت زندگی. جامعه‌شناسی کاربردی، 23(3)، 141-166.
  7. دریفوس، ه.، و رابینو، پ. (1379). میشل فوکو فراسویی ساختارگرایی و هرمونتیک. (ح. بشریه، مترجم). تهران: نشر نی.
  8. ریتزر، ج. (1386). نظریه جامعه‌شناسی در دوران معاصر (م. ثلاثی، مترجم). تهران: انتشارات علمی.
  9. سیدمن، ا. (1391). کشاکش آرا در جامعه‌شناسی (ه. جلیلی، مترجم). تهران: نشر نی.
  10. صدیق اورعی، غ.، غنی‌زاده، م.، صداقت ، ه.، و کابلی، ع. (1397). نگرش و موضع زنان و دختران مشهدی به حجاب. مطالعات فرهنگ - ارتباطات، 19(44)، 229-252.
  11. فروید، ز. (1343). سه رساله درباره تئوری میل جنسی (ه. رضی، مترجم). تهران: انتشارات آسیا.
  12. فوکو، م. (1389). تولد زیست سیاست؛ درس گفتارهای کُلِژ دو فرانس، 1979-1978 (ر. نجف‌زاده، مترجم). تهران: نی.فوکو، م. (1396). اراده به دانستن (ن. سرخوش، و ا. جهاندیده، مترجم). تهران: نی.
  13. فوکو، م. (1396). اراده به دانستن (ن. سرخوش، و ا. جهاندیده، مترجم). تهران: نی.
  14. فوکو، م. (1397). مراقبت و تنبیه؛ تولد زندان (ن. سرخوش، و ا. حهاندیده، مترجم). تهران: نی.
  15. کرایب، ی. (1391). نظریه اجتماعی مدرن، از پارسونز تا هابرماس (ع. مخبر، مترجم). تهران: نشر آگه.
  16. گیدنز، آ. (1377). پیامدهای مدرنیت (م. ثلاثی، مترجم). تهران: نشر مرکز.

 

  1. Altman, D. (1993). Homosexual: Oppression and liberation. NYU Press.
  2. Beasley, C. (2005). Gender and sexuality: Critical theories, critical thinkers. London: Sage.
  3. Bernstein, M. (2013). The sociology of sexualities: Taking stock of the field. Contemporary Sociology, 42(1), 22-31.
  4. Cornwall, A., Corrêa , S., & Jolly, J. (2008). Development with a Body: Making the connections between sexuality, human rights and development. In A. Cornwall, S. Corrêa, & J. Jolly (Eds.), Development with a body: sexuality, human rights and development. London, New York: Zed Books.
  5. D’Emilio, J. (2007). Capitalism and gay identity. In R. Parker , & P. Aggleton, Culture, Society and Sexuality (2 edition ed.). London & NewYork: Routledge.
  6. Foucault, M. (1984). The will to knowledge: Volume 1 of the history of sexuality (R. Hurley, Trans). New York: Pantheon books.
  7. Foucault, M. (1985). The use of pleasure: Volume 2 of the history of sexuality (R. Hurley, Trans). NewYork: vintage books. (Original work published 1985).
  8. Foucault, M. (1986 ). The care of the self: Volume 3 of The History of Sexuality (R. Hurley, Trans). New York: Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1984).
  9. Glossary of LGBTQ Terms. (2021). Retrieved from doi: https:// www. dictionary. com/
  10. Graziottin, A. (2000). Libido: the biologic scenario. Maturitas, (34), S9-S16.
  11. Green, A. (2007). Queer theory and sociology: Locating the subject and the self in sexuality studies. Sociological Theory, 25(1), 26-45.
  12. Gutting, G. (2018, May 22). Foucault. Retrieved from stanford encyclopedia of philosophy: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/foucault/
  13. Hall, D. (2003). Queer theories. New Yok: Red Globe Press.
  14. Hausman, B. (2001). Recent transgender theory. Feminist studies, 27(2), 465-490.
  15. Jagose, A. (1996). Queer theory: An introduction. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
  16. Kirsch, M. (2000). Queer theory and social change (2nd). London & New York: Routledge.
  17. Mahdavi, P. (2009). Passionate uprisings: Iran's sexual revolution. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  18. Moon, D. (2008). Culture and the sociology of sexuality: It's only natural? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 619(1), 183-205.
  19. Nagoshi, J., & Brzuzy, S. (2010). Transgender theory: Embodying research and practice. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 25(4), 431-443.
  20. Newman, L. K. (2002). Sex, gender and culture: Issues in the definition, assessment and treatment of gender identity disorder. Clinical child psychology and psychiatry7(3), 352-359.
  21. Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., . . ., & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A Product from the ESRC methods programme. Academia Accelerating the World's Research.
  22. Rahman, M., & Jackson, S. (2010). Gender and sexuality: Sociological approaches. Bristol: Polity.
  23. Roen, K. (2002). Either/Or" and" Both/Neither": Discursive Tensions in Transgender Politics-TEST. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 27(2), 501-522.
  24. Rother, E. T. (2007). Systematic literature review X narrative review. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem20, v-vi.
  25. Sadeghi, F. (2008). Negotiating with modernity: Young women and sexuality in Iran. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 28(2), 250-259.
  26. Salih, S. (2002). Judith butler. London & New York: Routledge.
  27. Sears, A. (2005). Queer anti-capitalism: What's left of lesbian and gay liberation? Science & Society, (69), 92-112.
  28. Stryker, S. (2011). My words to Victor Frankenstein above the village of chamounix: Performing transgender rage. Kvinder, Køn & Forskning, (3-4), 83-96.
  29. Turner, W. B. (2000). A genealogy of queer theory (Vol. 12). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  30. Vance, C. S. (1991). Anthropology rediscovers sexuality: A theoretical comment. Culture, society and Sexuality, 33(8), 875-884.
  31. Warner, M. (1993). Fear of a queer planet: Queer politics and social theory (Vol. 6). Minnesota: Minnesota Press.
  32. Weeks, J. (2002). Sexuality and its discontents: Meanings, myths, and modern sexualities. London & New York: Routledge.
  33. Winter, T. (2004). Victorian Era. In American Masculinities: A Historical Encyclopedia (pp. 473-475). London: SAGE Publications.
CAPTCHA Image